This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gellman, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Gender and Sexuality in the Garden of Eden

gellman{at}bgu.ac.il

Various attempts have been made to argue that the plain meaning of the story of the Garden of Eden in Genesis 2-3 supports a feminist, or at least a woman-friendly, understanding of the gender and sexual relationships between Adam and Eve. I counter that these arguments are not convincing and are hard to square with the biblical text, by considering four central elements in the story: (1) The sexual nature of ha’adam, Adam/the earthling at the start of our story; (2) God’s ‘curse’ of Eve; (3) The meaning of the woman being a ‘helper’ to Adam; and (4) Adam’s naming of the woman. I conclude that the most plausible meaning of these chapters is that Adam dominates Eve sexually and otherwise from the very moment of Eve’s creation.

Key Words: Garden of Eden • Adam • Eve • patriarchy in the Bible • feminist interpretation • sexuality in the Bible • Phyllis Trible • Phyllis Bird

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?